File: /home/w3com/mail/.felipa_pereira@w3_com_py/new/1644951765.H615803P17260.s3.yayogua.com.py,S=3964
Return-path: <sgvsftc@effv.com>
Envelope-to: info@w3.com.py
Delivery-date: Tue, 15 Feb 2022 16:02:45 -0300
Received: from [114.237.155.217] (port=3708 helo=effv.com)
by s3.yayogua.com.py with esmtp (Exim 4.87)
(envelope-from <sgvsftc@effv.com>)
id 1nK35z-0004P4-Uc
for info@w3.com.py; Tue, 15 Feb 2022 16:02:45 -0300
Received: from vps32589 ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost via TCP with ESMTPA; Wed, 16 Feb 2022 03:02:04 +0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Jane <chuangpiao231@126.com>
Sender: Jane <sgvsftc@effv.com>
To: info@w3.com.py
Reply-To: Jane <chuangpiao231@126.com>
Date: 16 Feb 2022 03:02:04 +0800
Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=8.5
X-Spam-Score: 85
X-Spam-Bar: ++++++++
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "s3.yayogua.com.py",
has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original
message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
root\@localhost for details.
Content preview: Dears, We are the Professional Manufacturer about: I-PEX、IPX;
U.FL/UFL; H.FL; RF Cable; RF Cable Assembly; Mini Coaxial Connectors; Hirose
U.FL mini connector; SMA and so on. We have our own factory ,if you are interested
in getting some sample tests first, please contact me and let me know more
about your requirements. [...]
Content analysis details: (8.5 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
1.0 BAYES_999 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 99.9 to 100%
[score: 1.0000]
5.0 BAYES_99 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 99 to 100%
[score: 1.0000]
0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
(chuangpiao231[at]126.com)
0.2 FREEMAIL_REPLYTO_END_DIGIT Reply-To freemail username ends in digit
(chuangpiao231[at]126.com)
0.2 HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level mail
domains are different
1.3 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL RBL: Relay in Validity RPBL,
https://senderscore.org/blocklistlookup/
[114.237.155.217 listed in bl.score.senderscore.com]
-5.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, high
trust
[114.237.155.217 listed in list.dnswl.org]
0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
0.1 MIME_HTML_ONLY BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts
1.8 PYZOR_CHECK Listed in Pyzor (https://pyzor.readthedocs.io/en/latest/)
0.2 FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN 2nd level domains in From and EnvelopeFrom
freemail headers are different
2.0 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS
-0.0 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE No description available.
1.6 MISSING_MID Missing Message-Id: header
0.0 SPOOFED_FREEMAIL_NO_RDNS From SPOOFED_FREEMAIL and no rDNS
X-Spam-Flag: YES
Subject: ***SPAM*** =?utf-8?B?UmU6IE5ldyB0ZWNobm9sb2d5IGRldGFpbHM=?=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